Smart Money with Keith Springer Saturdays at 1PM and Sundays at 6AM on NewsRadio KFBK 93.1 FM and 1530 AM

Keith Springer quoted on CNBC- Dow Nears Record, But Is It Just Another Bubble?

Dow Nears Record, But Is It Just Another Bubble?

Posted By: Jeff Cox | Senior Writer| 25 Jan 2013 |  Read Original Article

While getting to this point seemed unimaginable not long ago, the Dow industrials are nearing an all-time high after a tumultuous recent past and a decidedly uncertain future.

A Dow Jones Industrial Average trading over 14,000 seems like a quaint relic that hearkens back to the days before subprime, before the near-collapse of Wall Street, before the economy depended on Federal Reserve printing presses to stay afloat.

Looking ahead, the market confronts a set of circumstances with cross purposes: It needs the Fed to keep pushing stimulus but eventually must break free from that support if the gains are going to be sustained.

“We’re screwed long-term,” said Keith Springer, president of Springer Financial Advisory in Sacramento, Calif. “But what’s funny is this has been the trend for the last 20 years. We have a crisis, build a bubble to get out of it for five years, the market makes a slight new high, and then we crash.”

The Dow hit its closing high of 14,164.53 on Oct. 9, 2007 amid a surge in optimism that there was virtually no limit to how high the market could climb.

The question of whether the current market is in a bubble phase – as Springer suggests – is likely one that will be answered only in retrospect. But there is little debate over whether the Fed has played an integral role in pumping it higher.

Those few who are unsure can check the central bank’s own literature: A July 11, 2012 study from the New York Fed stated flatly that the market owed most of its post-1994 gains – that’s more than 1,000 points ago on the Standard & Poor’s 500 – to the 24-hour period before the Fed’s Open Markets Committee meetings.

It is at those meetings, held eight times a year, where the Fed decides how it will target interest rates. And for the past four years, it also has been the scene for the FOMC to decide how much money it will create to inject into the economy. Some $3 trillion later, the Fed’s influence is unmistakable as investors have piled into equities ahead of meetings where the Fed was expected to boost its easing measures or at least hold the line.

“Central bank liquidity has been by far and away the most important driver of asset prices since the Great Financial Crisis,” Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said in a report. “Liquidity has been the basis for our ‘I’m so bearish, I’m bullish’ view of financial markets over this period.”

Indeed, investors have relied on the Fed to respond to bearish economic data with three phases of asset purchases, or quantitative easing. So good economic news sometimes is looked on unfavorably by a market that both has come to rely on its central bank backstop and fears that any upturn in the data will deter the Fed from more easing.

Hartnett, though, projects that cycle to end this year as confidence returns to the market.

Professional traders pay more attention to the Standard & Poor’s 500 because it is a broader measure of stock market performance. (Read More: S&P Tops 1,500: Where the Market Goes From Here

But the public usually follows the Dow, which is comprised of just 30 stocks but is considered a barometer for how bluechip companies are performing.

The top gainers between the market peak and now have been bread-and-butter companies: Home Depot (up 97%), IBM (73 percent) and McDonald’s (63 percent). However, most of the market’s rise in general has been due to company share buybacks rather than average investors jumping back in.

The great quandary of the post-2009 rally has been the absence of the retail, or mom-and-pop, investor. Mutual fund flows are the most popular way to track retail involvement because they are more popular than individual stocks.

They have told a dismal story about confidence.

Some $600 billion has come out of equity funds since 2006, while $800 billion has gone into the comparative safety of bond funds. That trend has changed recently, with $35 billion back in stock-based funds in the past two weeks, $19 billion of which is in long-only funds.

“The past seven years have seen a Great Divergence in terms of fund flows,” said Hartnett, whose firm is predicting a “Great Rotation” from bonds to stocks this year. “But recent data show the first genuine signs of equity belief in years.”

If Hartnett is correct and the trend continues, it could bolster the argument that the Fed merely gave the economy and the markets the nudge they needed, and corporate America has done the rest.

“It’s more than just the Fed. Stock market indices are where they are today because they’ve earned it,” said Lawrence Creatura, equity market strategist and portfolio manager at Federated Clover Investment Advisors in Rochester, N.Y. “There hasn’t been a lot of multiple expansion. However, there has been a lot of earnings growth since the troubles of the financial crisis.”

Indeed, quarterly earnings for the S&P 500 reached a crisis nadir of minus-9 cents a share for the fourth quarter of 2008, when QE began, to an expected profit of $25.18 a share for the fourth quarter of 2012, according to Howard Silverblatt, S&P Capital IQ’s senior index analyst.

Creatura looks at the steel industry as one place that will demonstrate fundamental economic growth and push a market higher beyond the Fed’s machinations.

“We’re in the middle of earnings season. We’re learning more every day about the health of individual industries,” he said. “It will be important to pick your spots. Not all industries are created equal.”

But what of the end of the Fed involvement? Can the market stand on its own?

“In the very short term, investors would very likely perceive it as negative,” Creatura said. “It’s important to realize it probably wouldn’t occur unless the economy was showing signs of strength.”

Not necessarily.

The Fed also could be forced to shut down the printing presses if inflation gets out of hand, a condition that usually happens with little notice. If inflation surges and the economy is still weak, the Fed could find itself in an untenable situation.

“You’d want to be out of stocks. That’s a bunch of baloney when they say (the end of QE) can happen gradually,” Springer said. “As soon as they announce they’re not going to keep printing money and pumping money in, that’s going to be the end.”


Springer Financial Advisors ("Advisor") is a federally registered investment adviser located in Sacramento, California. Advisor and its representatives are in compliance with the current filing requirements imposed upon registered investment advisers by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the State of California. Advisor's web site and its emails of general distribution are limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications, and links. Accordingly, the publication of Advisor's web site on the Internet or dissemination of informational emails should not be construed by any consumer and/or prospective client as Advisor's solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect transactions in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, over the Internet. A copy of Advisor's current written disclosure statement discussing Advisor's business operations, services, and fees is available from Advisor upon written request. You may also obtain publicly available information about Advisor through the SEC website as follows: Advisor does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Advisor's web site or incorporated in an email, and takes no responsibility therefore. All such information is believed to be reliable and authoritative but does not constitute sufficient information to be the sole basis for sound investment decisions and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Advisor) made reference to directly or indirectly by Advisor in its web site, email, or indirectly via a link to an unaffiliated third party web site, will be profitable or equal the corresponding indicated performance level(s). Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will either be suitable or profitable for a client or prospective client's investment portfolio. Certain portions of Advisor's web site (i.e. articles, commentaries, etc.) may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, Advisor's (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) positions and/or recommendations as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current position(s) and/or recommendation(s). Moreover, no client or prospective client should assume that any such discussion serves as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized advice from Advisor, or from any other investment professional. The information is of a general nature and should not be applied indiscriminately to particular situations wherein it may not be completely applicable. Advisor is neither an attorney nor an accountant, and no portion of the content should be interpreted as legal, accounting or tax advice.